Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gene Yoon's avatar

Seems like you're crediting techno-optimism with all of the advancements in computing technology up til now - this seems incorrect, in my personal experience of 25+ years in tech. Many if not most of the critical advances in personal computing, the Internet, and the Web were made by hippies, weirdos, and geeks who were inspired and motivated by humanity much more than technology. I'd say that these people were already techno-humanists in the way that you described. Only in the last 15 years or so has the tech industry become infested with the type of simplistic tech determinists who have cynically rebranded themselves as techno-optimists. Techno-humanism is in this sense a revivalist movement rather than a new evolution.

Expand full comment
Stellan72's avatar

I'm somewhat frustrated by electionscience.org

https://electionscience.org/library/approval-voting-versus-irv/

taking an activist stance on approval voting and not actually giving a balanced comparison of both its strengths and weaknesses relative to rcv/irv. Contrast the picture painted by that first link with the one painted by this other source

https://fairvote.org/resources/electoral-systems/ranked_choice_voting_vs_approval_voting/

Afaict, the "approval voting beats rcv" cases outlined in the first source are specific to particular (potentially large) ranges of numeric ratios between the candidates, but the articles on electionscience.org present them as if they were universal patterns. Meanwhile, I can't see it acknowledging any of the ways in which approval voting incentivizes its own types of strategic behavior (see second link), or the impacts on election civility of each voting method.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts